About Us

|

Services

|

Useful Links

|

E-Mail

|

Contact Us

|

Enquire

|

FAQ's

|

Site Map


 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    For the purposes of sub-rule (1), the comparability of an international transaction with an uncontrolled transaction shall be judged with reference to the following, namely:-

    • the specific characteristics of the property transferred or services provided in either transaction;
    • the functions performed, taking into account assets employed or to be employed and the risks assumed, by the respective parties to the transactions;
    • the contractual terms (whether or not such terms are formal or in writing) of the transactions which lay down explicitly or implicitly how the responsibilities, risks and benefits are to be divided between the respective parties to the transactions;
    • conditions prevailing in the markets in which the respective parties to the transactions operate, including the geographical location and size of the markets, the laws and government orders in force, costs of labour and capital in the markets, overall economic development and level of competition and whether the markets are wholesale or retail.
  • An uncontrolled transaction shall be comparable to an international transaction if –
    • none of the differences, if any, between the transactions being compared, or between the enterprises entering into such transactions are likely to materially affect the price or cost charged or paid in, or the profit arising from, such transactions in the open market; or
    • reasonably accurate adjustments can be made to eliminate the material effects of such differences.

The data to be used in analysing the comparability of an uncontrolled transaction with an international transaction shall be the
data relating to the financial year in which the international transaction has been entered into

  • Provided that data relating to a period not being more than two years prior to such financial year may also be considered if such data reveals facts which could have an influence on the determination of transfer prices in relation to the transactions being compared.

10C. Most appropriate method

  • For the purposes of sub-section (1) of section 92C, the most appropriate method shall be the method which is best suited to the facts and circumstances of each particular international transaction, and which provides the most reliable measure of an arm’s length price in relation to the international transaction
  • In selecting the most appropriate method as specified in sub-rule (1), the following factors shall be taken into account, namely:-
    • the nature and class of the international transaction;
    • the class or classes of associated enterprises entering into the transaction and the functions performed by them taking into account assets employed or to be employed and risks assumed by such enterprises;
    • the availability, coverage and reliability of data necessary for application of the method;
    • the degree of comparability existing between the international transaction and the uncontrolled transaction and between the enterprises entering into such transactions;
    • the extent to which reliable and accurate adjustments can be made to account for differences, if any, between the international transaction and the comparable uncontrolled transaction or between the enterprises entering into such transactions;
    • the nature, extent and reliability of assumptions required to be made in application of a method

 

   

Investment | Economy | Info. Technology | Taxation | Regulatory
About Us
| Services | Useful Links | Contact Us | FAQ's | Enquire | Site Map